[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJrc5xjeHp5vYtAO@boxer>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 14:58:15 +0200
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To: Moritz Fischer <moritzf@...gle.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
<mdf@...nel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: lan743x: Don't sleep in atomic context
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 03:50:00AM +0000, Moritz Fischer wrote:
Hi Moritz,
> dev_set_rx_mode() grabs a spin_lock, and the lan743x implementation
> proceeds subsequently to go to sleep using readx_poll_timeout().
>
> Introduce a helper wrapping the readx_poll_timeout_atomic() function
> and use it to replace the calls to readx_polL_timeout().
nit: weird typo with capital L
>
> Fixes: 23f0703c125b ("lan743x: Add main source files for new lan743x driver")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Bryan Whitehead <bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com>
> Cc: UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritzf@...gle.com>
> ---
>
> Changes from v2:
> - Incorporate suggestion from Jakub
suggestions were to skip the ternary operator i believe - would be good to
spell this out here
>
> Changes from v1:
> - Added line-breaks
> - Changed subject to target net-next
> - Removed Tested-by: tag
>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c
> index f1bded993edc..61eadc0bca8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c
> @@ -144,6 +144,18 @@ static int lan743x_csr_light_reset(struct lan743x_adapter *adapter)
> !(data & HW_CFG_LRST_), 100000, 10000000);
> }
>
> +static int lan743x_csr_wait_for_bit_atomic(struct lan743x_adapter *adapter,
adapter is not used in readx_poll_timeout_atomic() call, right?
can be removed.
> + int offset, u32 bit_mask,
> + int target_value, int udelay_min,
> + int udelay_max, int count)
> +{
> + u32 data;
> +
> + return readx_poll_timeout_atomic(LAN743X_CSR_READ_OP, offset, data,
> + target_value == !!(data & bit_mask),
> + udelay_max, udelay_min * count);
> +}
> +
> static int lan743x_csr_wait_for_bit(struct lan743x_adapter *adapter,
> int offset, u32 bit_mask,
> int target_value, int usleep_min,
> @@ -736,8 +748,8 @@ static int lan743x_dp_write(struct lan743x_adapter *adapter,
> u32 dp_sel;
> int i;
>
> - if (lan743x_csr_wait_for_bit(adapter, DP_SEL, DP_SEL_DPRDY_,
> - 1, 40, 100, 100))
> + if (lan743x_csr_wait_for_bit_atomic(adapter, DP_SEL, DP_SEL_DPRDY_,
> + 1, 40, 100, 100))
> return -EIO;
> dp_sel = lan743x_csr_read(adapter, DP_SEL);
> dp_sel &= ~DP_SEL_MASK_;
> @@ -748,8 +760,9 @@ static int lan743x_dp_write(struct lan743x_adapter *adapter,
> lan743x_csr_write(adapter, DP_ADDR, addr + i);
> lan743x_csr_write(adapter, DP_DATA_0, buf[i]);
> lan743x_csr_write(adapter, DP_CMD, DP_CMD_WRITE_);
> - if (lan743x_csr_wait_for_bit(adapter, DP_SEL, DP_SEL_DPRDY_,
> - 1, 40, 100, 100))
> + if (lan743x_csr_wait_for_bit_atomic(adapter, DP_SEL,
> + DP_SEL_DPRDY_,
> + 1, 40, 100, 100))
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> --
> 2.41.0.178.g377b9f9a00-goog
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists