lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 15:35:12 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...nel.org>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Alexei Starovoitov
 <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, John Fastabend
 <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, bpf
 <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel
 Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
 Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Hao Luo
 <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Network Development
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 11/11] net/mlx5e: Support TX timestamp metadata

Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> writes:

> Ack, let me see if I can fit tx csum into the picture. I still feel
> like we need these dev-bound tracing programs if we want to trigger
> kfuncs safely, but maybe we can simplify further..

FWIW, I absolutely think we should go with "attach to ifindex + dev
bound" model instead of the "attach to driver kfunc and check ifindex in
BPF". The latter may be fine for BPF kernel devs, but it's a terrible
API for a dataplane, which IMO is what we're building here...

-Toke

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ