[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878rc5hvu7.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 15:35:12 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...nel.org>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, bpf
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel
Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Hao Luo
<haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Network Development
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 11/11] net/mlx5e: Support TX timestamp metadata
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> writes:
> Ack, let me see if I can fit tx csum into the picture. I still feel
> like we need these dev-bound tracing programs if we want to trigger
> kfuncs safely, but maybe we can simplify further..
FWIW, I absolutely think we should go with "attach to ifindex + dev
bound" model instead of the "attach to driver kfunc and check ifindex in
BPF". The latter may be fine for BPF kernel devs, but it's a terrible
API for a dataplane, which IMO is what we're building here...
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists