[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230627084651.055a228c@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:46:51 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Claudiu Manoil
<claudiu.manoil@....com>, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Xiaoliang
Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>, Richard Cochran
<richardcochran@...il.com>, Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: dsa: felix: don't drop PTP frames with
tag_8021q when RX timestamping is disabled
On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:12:22 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> This is still not as good as I had wanted it, because simply checking
> for HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE does not distinguish between L2 and L4
> timestamping filters, and a port configured just with L2 traps will
> still drop L4 PTP packets.
Out of curiosity - quick survey on why your reply does not contain:
pw-bot: changes-requested
a) your email address is different and the bot doesn't understand
aliases
b) commands are hard to remember
c) don't care about patchwork
d) laziness
e) other
Powered by blists - more mailing lists