[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230627155147.atvr32v3vldnybrc@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:51:47 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: dsa: felix: don't drop PTP frames with
tag_8021q when RX timestamping is disabled
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 08:46:51AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:12:22 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > This is still not as good as I had wanted it, because simply checking
> > for HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE does not distinguish between L2 and L4
> > timestamping filters, and a port configured just with L2 traps will
> > still drop L4 PTP packets.
>
> Out of curiosity - quick survey on why your reply does not contain:
>
> pw-bot: changes-requested
>
> a) your email address is different and the bot doesn't understand
> aliases
> b) commands are hard to remember
> c) don't care about patchwork
> d) laziness
> e) other
hmm, I'll tick e) unslept...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists