[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230629164150.2068747-1-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 16:41:50 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] tcp: annotate data races in __tcp_oow_rate_limited()
request sockets are lockless, __tcp_oow_rate_limited() could be called
on the same object from different cpus. This is harmless.
Add READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() annotations to avoid a KCSAN report.
Fixes: 4ce7e93cb3fe ("tcp: rate limit ACK sent by SYN_RECV request sockets")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 6f072095211efc9c3b3a561f67750ae454fd576b..57c8af1859c16eba5e952a23ea959b628006f9c1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3590,8 +3590,11 @@ static int tcp_ack_update_window(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, u32
static bool __tcp_oow_rate_limited(struct net *net, int mib_idx,
u32 *last_oow_ack_time)
{
- if (*last_oow_ack_time) {
- s32 elapsed = (s32)(tcp_jiffies32 - *last_oow_ack_time);
+ /* Paired with the WRITE_ONCE() in this function. */
+ u32 val = READ_ONCE(*last_oow_ack_time);
+
+ if (val) {
+ s32 elapsed = (s32)(tcp_jiffies32 - val);
if (0 <= elapsed &&
elapsed < READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_invalid_ratelimit)) {
@@ -3600,7 +3603,10 @@ static bool __tcp_oow_rate_limited(struct net *net, int mib_idx,
}
}
- *last_oow_ack_time = tcp_jiffies32;
+ /* Paired with the prior READ_ONCE() and with itself,
+ * as we might be lockless.
+ */
+ WRITE_ONCE(*last_oow_ack_time, tcp_jiffies32);
return false; /* not rate-limited: go ahead, send dupack now! */
}
--
2.41.0.255.g8b1d071c50-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists