netdev - Re: [net PATCH] octeontx2-af: Install TC filter rules in hardware based on priority

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 17:53:47 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
CC: <sgoutham@...vell.com>, <gakula@...vell.com>, <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
	<hkelam@...vell.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net PATCH] octeontx2-af: Install TC filter rules in hardware
 based on priority

From: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 17:35:36 +0530

> As of today, hardware does not support installing tc filter
> rules based on priority. This patch fixes the issue and install
> the hardware rules based on priority. The final hardware rules
> will not be dependent on rule installation order, it will be strictly
> priority based, same as software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
1. Targeted net (fixes), but no "Fixes:" tag.
2. 350 locs of changes in a single commit. Is it so atomic, so that
   even can't be split logically?
   Esp. given that it's claimed as a fix, not a feature. Single 350-locs
   fixes do happen, but *very* rarely.

Thanks,
Olek