netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: gro: fix misuse of CB in udp socket lookup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2291aa12-3081-5e65-dc64-bf3d4349dfea@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:50:28 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, tom@...bertland.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gal@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: gro: fix misuse of CB in udp socket lookup

On 7/10/23 8:58 AM, Richard Gobert wrote:
>> put your cover letter details in here; no need for a cover letter for a
>> single patch.
> 
> I believe some details are irrelevant to the bugfix itself,
> I prefer to avoid overloading the commit message...
> Do you think there is a specific part of the cover letter that
> should be added to the commit message?
> 
>> there are existing iif and sdif lookup functions. I believe this gro
>> path needs a different version, but it should have a comment of when it
>> can be used vs the existing ones. Also, it is small enough to be an
>> inline like the existing ones. e.g., see inet_sdif
> 
> I was under the impression the coding style of Linux does not
> encourage placing the inline keyword.
> In which cases do you think I should add it?

See the existing *_sdif helpers in include/net/ip.h,
include/linux/ipv6.h and include/net/tcp.h.