[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SJ0PR18MB52167FE0788EE594D7796E19DB36A@SJ0PR18MB5216.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 06:56:05 +0000
From: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
CC: Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Geethasowjanya Akula
<gakula@...vell.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [net PATCH V2] octeontx2-af: Fix issues with NPC field
hash extract
>> 1. Allow field hash configuration for both source and destination
>IPv6.
>> 2. Configure hardware parser based on hash extract feature enable flag
>> for IPv6.
>> 3. Fix IPv6 endianness issue while updating the source/destination IP
>> address via ntuple rule.
>> 4. Update hash extraction mbox message.
>> 5. Enable hash extraction based on the MKEX profile
>
>That's a lot. Can't this patch be split? For example, one commit per
>list item? I don't think it's atomic.
[Suman] Okay. I will split the patches
>
>>
>> Fixes: 56d9f5fd2246 ("octeontx2-af: Use hashed field in MCAM key")
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
>[...]
>
>Thanks,
>Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists