[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ed58545-c10a-d789-04d5-4eb715f4906d@starfivetech.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 16:28:55 +0800
From: Guo Samin <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>, Frank
<Frank.Sae@...or-comm.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Eric
Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: net: motorcomm: Add pad driver
strength cfg
-------- 原始信息 --------
主题: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: net: motorcomm: Add pad driver strength cfg
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
收件人: Samin Guo <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>
日期: 2023/7/15
>> + motorcomm,rx-clk-driver-strength:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>> + description: |
>> + drive strength of rx_clk rgmii pad.
>> + |----------------------------------|
>> + | rx_clk ds map table |
>> + |----------------------------------|
>> + | DS(3b) | wol@...v | wol@...v |
>> + |________|_________________________|
>> + | | current(uA)| current(uA)|
>> + | 000 | 1200 | 3070 |
>> + | 001 | 2100 | 4080 |
>> + | 010 | 2700 | 4370 |
>> + | 011 | 2910 | 4680 |
>> + | 100 | 3110 | 5020 |
>> + | 101 | 3600 | 5450 |
>> + | 110 | 3970 | 5740 |
>> + | 111 | 4350 | 6140 |
>> + |--------|------------|------------|
>> + enum: [ 1200, 2100, 2700, 2910, 3070, 3110, 3600, 3970,
>> + 4080, 4350, 4370, 4680, 5020, 5450, 5740, 6140 ]
>> + default: 2910
>
> The DS(3b) value is not relevant to the binding. It is a driver
> detail. So i would not bother listing it.
>
ok, will remove it.
> Please add a comment explaining what wol is.
>
> Andrew
Sorry,it should be vol (voltage), not wol.
Best regards,
Samin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists