[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230719084415.1378696-1-leitao@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 01:44:12 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: leit@...a.com,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@...alicyn.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: Use _K_SS_MAXSIZE instead of absolute value
Looking at sk_getsockopt function, it is unclear why 128 is a magical
number.
Use the proper macro, so it becomes clear to understand what the value
mean, and get a reference where it is coming from (user-exported API).
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
---
net/core/sock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 9370fd50aa2c..58b6f00197d6 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1815,7 +1815,7 @@ int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
case SO_PEERNAME:
{
- char address[128];
+ char address[_K_SS_MAXSIZE];
lv = sock->ops->getname(sock, (struct sockaddr *)address, 2);
if (lv < 0)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists