| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230721162226.8639-1-astrajoan@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:22:26 -0700
From: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@...oo.com>
To: astrajoan@...oo.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
ivan.orlov0322@...il.com,
kernel@...gutronix.de,
kuba@...nel.org,
linux@...pel-privat.de,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
mkl@...gutronix.de,
pabeni@...hat.com,
robin@...tonic.nl,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
socketcan@...tkopp.net
Cc: arnd@...db.de,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mudongliangabcd@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nikolay@...dia.com,
roopa@...dia.com,
syzbot+881d65229ca4f9ae8c84@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
syzbot+1591462f226d9cbf0564@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] can: j1939: prevent deadlock by changing j1939_socks_lock to rwlock
The following 3 locks would race against each other, causing the
deadlock situation in the Syzbot bug report:
- j1939_socks_lock
- active_session_list_lock
- sk_session_queue_lock
A reasonable fix is to change j1939_socks_lock to an rwlock, since in
the rare situations where a write lock is required for the linked list
that j1939_socks_lock is protecting, the code does not attempt to
acquire any more locks. This would break the circular lock dependency,
where, for example, the current thread already locks j1939_socks_lock
and attempts to acquire sk_session_queue_lock, and at the same time,
another thread attempts to acquire j1939_socks_lock while holding
sk_session_queue_lock.
NOTE: This patch along does not fix the unregister_netdevice bug
reported by Syzbot; instead, it solves a deadlock situation to prepare
for one or more further patches to actually fix the Syzbot bug, which
appears to be a reference counting problem within the j1939 codebase.
Reported-by: syzbot+1591462f226d9cbf0564@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@...oo.com>
---
net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h | 2 +-
net/can/j1939/main.c | 2 +-
net/can/j1939/socket.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h b/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h
index 16af1a7f80f6..74f15592d170 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h
+++ b/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct j1939_priv {
unsigned int tp_max_packet_size;
/* lock for j1939_socks list */
- spinlock_t j1939_socks_lock;
+ rwlock_t j1939_socks_lock;
struct list_head j1939_socks;
struct kref rx_kref;
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/main.c b/net/can/j1939/main.c
index ecff1c947d68..a6fb89fa6278 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/main.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/main.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ struct j1939_priv *j1939_netdev_start(struct net_device *ndev)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
j1939_tp_init(priv);
- spin_lock_init(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ rwlock_init(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->j1939_socks);
mutex_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/socket.c b/net/can/j1939/socket.c
index feaec4ad6d16..a8b981dc2065 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/socket.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/socket.c
@@ -80,16 +80,16 @@ static void j1939_jsk_add(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct j1939_sock *jsk)
jsk->state |= J1939_SOCK_BOUND;
j1939_priv_get(priv);
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ write_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
list_add_tail(&jsk->list, &priv->j1939_socks);
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ write_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
}
static void j1939_jsk_del(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct j1939_sock *jsk)
{
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ write_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
list_del_init(&jsk->list);
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ write_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
j1939_priv_put(priv);
jsk->state &= ~J1939_SOCK_BOUND;
@@ -329,13 +329,13 @@ bool j1939_sk_recv_match(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb)
struct j1939_sock *jsk;
bool match = false;
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
match = j1939_sk_recv_match_one(jsk, skcb);
if (match)
break;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
return match;
}
@@ -344,11 +344,11 @@ void j1939_sk_recv(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct j1939_sock *jsk;
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
j1939_sk_recv_one(jsk, skb);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
}
static void j1939_sk_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
@@ -484,6 +484,7 @@ static int j1939_sk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)
priv = j1939_netdev_start(ndev);
dev_put(ndev);
+
if (IS_ERR(priv)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(priv);
goto out_release_sock;
@@ -1078,12 +1079,12 @@ void j1939_sk_errqueue(struct j1939_session *session,
}
/* spread RX notifications to all sockets subscribed to this session */
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
if (j1939_sk_recv_match_one(jsk, &session->skcb))
__j1939_sk_errqueue(session, &jsk->sk, type);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
};
void j1939_sk_send_loop_abort(struct sock *sk, int err)
@@ -1271,7 +1272,7 @@ void j1939_sk_netdev_event_netdown(struct j1939_priv *priv)
struct j1939_sock *jsk;
int error_code = ENETDOWN;
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
jsk->sk.sk_err = error_code;
if (!sock_flag(&jsk->sk, SOCK_DEAD))
@@ -1279,7 +1280,7 @@ void j1939_sk_netdev_event_netdown(struct j1939_priv *priv)
j1939_sk_queue_drop_all(priv, jsk, error_code);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
}
static int j1939_sk_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists