| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB57515FDFE2A7733D1A37812CC13FA@DM8PR11MB5751.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 16:45:05 +0000
From: "Ng, Boon Khai" <boon.khai.ng@...el.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk@...nel.org>, "Boon@...mtp.png.intel.com" <Boon@...mtp.png.intel.com>,
"Khai@...mtp.png.intel.com" <Khai@...mtp.png.intel.com>, Giuseppe Cavallaro
<peppe.cavallaro@...com>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "Paolo
Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, "Tham, Mun Yew"
<mun.yew.tham@...el.com>, "Swee, Leong Ching" <leong.ching.swee@...el.com>,
"G Thomas, Rohan" <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>, Shevchenko Andriy
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [Enable Designware XGMAC VLAN Stripping Feature 2/2] net: stmmac:
dwxgmac2: Add support for HW-accelerated VLAN Stripping
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2023 12:30 AM
> To: Ng, Boon Khai <boon.khai.ng@...el.com>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzk@...nel.org>; Boon@...mtp.png.intel.com;
> Khai@...mtp.png.intel.com; Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>;
> Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>; Jose Abreu
> <joabreu@...opsys.com>; David S . Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric
> Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>;
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>; Maxime Coquelin
> <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-stm32@st-
> md-mailman.stormreply.com; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Shevchenko, Andriy <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>; Tham, Mun Yew
> <mun.yew.tham@...el.com>; Swee, Leong Ching
> <leong.ching.swee@...el.com>; G Thomas, Rohan
> <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>; Shevchenko Andriy
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Enable Designware XGMAC VLAN Stripping Feature 2/2] net:
> stmmac: dwxgmac2: Add support for HW-accelerated VLAN Stripping
>
>
>
> On 7/21/2023 9:12 AM, Ng, Boon Khai wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> >> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 11:59 PM
> >> To: Ng, Boon Khai <boon.khai.ng@...el.com>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >> <krzk@...nel.org>; Boon@...mtp.png.intel.com;
> >> Khai@...mtp.png.intel.com; Ng, Boon Khai <boon.khai.ng@...el.com>;
> >> Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>; Alexandre Torgue
> >> <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>; Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>;
> >> David S . Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> >> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo
> Abeni
> >> <pabeni@...hat.com>; Maxime Coquelin
> <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>;
> >> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-stm32@...md- mailman.stormreply.com;
> >> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux- kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >> Cc: Shevchenko, Andriy <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>; Tham, Mun
> Yew
> >> <mun.yew.tham@...el.com>; Swee, Leong Ching
> >> <leong.ching.swee@...el.com>; G Thomas, Rohan
> >> <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>; Shevchenko Andriy
> >> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [Enable Designware XGMAC VLAN Stripping Feature 2/2] net:
> >> stmmac: dwxgmac2: Add support for HW-accelerated VLAN Stripping
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/21/2023 8:30 AM, Ng, Boon Khai wrote:
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >>>> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 6:11 PM
> >>>> To: Boon@...mtp.png.intel.com; Khai@...mtp.png.intel.com; "Ng
> >>>> <boon.khai.ng"@intel.com; Giuseppe Cavallaro
> >>>> <peppe.cavallaro@...com>; Alexandre Torgue
> >>>> <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>; Jose Abreu
> <joabreu@...opsys.com>;
> >>>> David S . Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> >>>> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo
> >>>> Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>; Maxime Coquelin
> >>>> <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> >>>> linux-stm32@st- md-mailman.stormreply.com;
> >>>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux- kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >>>> Cc: Ng, Boon Khai <boon.khai.ng@...el.com>; Shevchenko, Andriy
> >>>> <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>; Tham, Mun Yew
> >>>> <mun.yew.tham@...el.com>; Swee, Leong Ching
> >>>> <leong.ching.swee@...el.com>; G Thomas, Rohan
> >>>> <rohan.g.thomas@...el.com>; Shevchenko Andriy
> >>>> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [Enable Designware XGMAC VLAN Stripping Feature 2/2]
> net:
> >>>> stmmac: dwxgmac2: Add support for HW-accelerated VLAN Stripping
> >>>>
> >>>> On 21/07/2023 08:26, Boon@...mtp.png.intel.com wrote:
> >>>>> From: Boon Khai Ng <boon.khai.ng@...el.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Currently, VLAN tag stripping is done by software driver in
> >>>>> stmmac_rx_vlan(). This patch is to Add support for VLAN tag
> >>>>> stripping by the MAC hardware and MAC drivers to support it.
> >>>>> This is done by adding rx_hw_vlan() and set_hw_vlan_mode()
> >>>>> callbacks at stmmac_ops struct which are called from upper software
> layer.
> >>>> ...
> >>>>
> >>>>> if (priv->dma_cap.vlhash) {
> >>>>> ndev->features |=
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER;
> >>>>> ndev->features |=
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_FILTER; diff --
> >>>> git
> >>>>> a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> >>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> >>>>> index 23d53ea04b24..bd7f3326a44c 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> >>>>> @@ -543,6 +543,12 @@ stmmac_probe_config_dt(struct
> platform_device
> >>>> *pdev, u8 *mac)
> >>>>> plat->flags |= STMMAC_FLAG_TSO_EN;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + /* Rx VLAN HW Stripping */
> >>>>> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "snps,rx-vlan-offload")) {
> >>>>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "RX VLAN HW Stripping\n");
> >>>>
> >>>> Why? Drop.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> This is an dts option export to dts for user to choose whether or
> >>> not they Want a Hardware stripping or a software stripping.
> >>>
> >>> May I know what is the reason to drop this?
> >>
> >> Because the networking stack already exposes knobs for drivers to
> >> advertise and control VLAN stripping/insertion on RX/TX using ethtool
> >> and feature bits (NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX,
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX).
> >>
> >
> > Hi Florian,
> >
> > Understood, but how does user choose to have the default option either
> > hardware strip or software strip, when the device just boot up?
>
> You need the hardware to advertise it and decide as a maintainer of that
> driver whether it makes sense to have one or the other behavior by default.
>
Okay got it.
> >
> > I don’t think ethool can "remember" the setting once the device get
> rebooted?
>
> If by "device" you mean a system that incorporates a XGMAC core, then I
> suppose that is true, though you could have some user-space logic that does
> remember the various ethtool options and re-applies them as soon as the
> device is made available to user-space, this would not be too far fetched.
>
Okay, will try to search that, is adding the ethool command turning the
Hw vlan striping at the startup script consider one way of doing it?
> > Any other suggestion of doing it other than using the dts method?
>
> Let me ask you this question: what are you trying to solve by making this
> configurable? HW stripping should always be more efficient, should not it, if
> so, what would be the reasons for not enabling that by default? If not, then
> leave it off and let users enable it if they feel like they want it.
Okay, so seem like it is solely depends on my side whether or not to turn it on by default,
Either way, if it go against the user will to have it on/off by default, they will need to write
A startup script to turn the ethool on/off?
> --
> Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists