netdev - Re: [RFC RESEND v1 pinctrl-next 1/1] pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: add activity and blink functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 11:55:35 -0700
From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
	Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND v1 pinctrl-next 1/1] pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: add
 activity and blink functionality

Hi Horaitu,

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 08:59:57AM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 07/20/2023 14:02, Colin Foster wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 09:25:32PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 4:23 AM Colin Foster
> > > <colin.foster@...advantage.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Add additional functions - two blink and two activity, for each SGPIO
> > > > output.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
> > >
> > > Could Lars or Horatiu review this patch? You guys know the driver
> > > best.
> > 
> > Agreed. Please don't merge this without their approval and hopefully
> > testing.
> > 
> 
> I have tried to apply the patch to test it, but unfortunately it doesn't
> apply.
> I have looked through the changes and they seem OK.

Is there a tree I should test these patches against? I don't have any
active development going on so I've been hopping along the latest RCs
instead of keeping up with net-next, gpio-next, or otherwise...

Anyway, thanks for taking a look!