netdev - Re: [RFC RESEND v1 pinctrl-next 1/1] pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: add activity and blink functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:00:54 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
Cc: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>, 
	Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>, 
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, 
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND v1 pinctrl-next 1/1] pinctrl: microchip-sgpio: add
 activity and blink functionality

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 8:55 PM Colin Foster
<colin.foster@...advantage.com> wrote:

> Is there a tree I should test these patches against? I don't have any
> active development going on so I've been hopping along the latest RCs
> instead of keeping up with net-next, gpio-next, or otherwise...

Use the "devel" branch in the pinctrl tree:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=devel

If you resend based on this branch I'll apply the patch, I think Horatiu's
reply counts as an Acked-by so record it as such.

Yours,
Linus Walleij