netdev - Re: [PATCH] scripts: checkpatch: steer people away from using file paths

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023072555-stamina-hurray-b95c@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 18:53:48 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: krzk@...nel.org, joe@...ches.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
	mario.limonciello@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: checkpatch: steer people away from using file
 paths

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 08:59:26AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> We repeatedly see noobs misuse get_maintainer by running it on
> the file paths rather than the patchfile. This leads to authors
> of changes (quoted commits and commits under Fixes) not getting
> CCed. These are usually the best reviewers!
> 
> The file option should really not be used by noobs, unless
> they are just trying to find a maintainer to manually contact.
> 
> Print a warning when someone tries to use -f and remove
> the "auto-guessing" of file paths.
> 
> This script may break people's "scripts on top of get_maintainer"
> if they are using -f... but that's the point.

Ok, I'll go fix up my local scripts, but you should change your subject
line to say "get_maintainer", not "checkpatch" :)

thanks,

greg k-h