[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230725095327.385616f1@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 09:53:27 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Lin Ma <linma@....edu.cn>, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, richardcochran@...il.com, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] i40e: Add length check for IFLA_AF_SPEC parsing
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:40:46 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > Empty attributes are valid, we can't do that.
>
> Maybe Lin can add special version of nla_for_each_nested() which will
> skip these empty NLAs, for code which don't allow empty attributes.
It's way too arbitrary. Empty attrs are 100% legit, they are called
NLA_FLAG in policy parlance. They are basically a boolean.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists