netdev - Re: [PATCH v1] i40e: Add length check for IFLA_AF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230725183652.GR11388@unreal>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 21:36:52 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Lin Ma <linma@....edu.cn>, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
	anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
	ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
	john.fastabend@...il.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] i40e: Add length check for IFLA_AF_SPEC parsing

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 09:53:27AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:40:46 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > Empty attributes are valid, we can't do that.  
> > 
> > Maybe Lin can add special version of nla_for_each_nested() which will
> > skip these empty NLAs, for code which don't allow empty attributes.
> 
> It's way too arbitrary. Empty attrs are 100% legit, they are called
> NLA_FLAG in policy parlance. They are basically a boolean.

I afraid that these nla_length() checks will be copied all other the
kernel without any understanding and netlink API doesn't really provide
any hint when length checks are needed and when they don't.

Thank