[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ec61192-c65c-62cc-d073-d6111b08e690@web.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:10:21 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Yan Zhai <yan@...udflare.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...udflare.com
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jordan Griege <jgriege@...udflare.com>, Jakub Sitnicki
<jakub@...udflare.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf 2/2] bpf: selftests: add lwt redirect regression
test cases
> Tests BPF redirect at the lwt xmit hook to ensure error handling are
> safe, i.e. won't panic the kernel.
Are imperative change descriptions still preferred?
See also:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.5-rc3#n94
Can remaining wording weaknesses be adjusted accordingly?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists