[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <729dd79e-83aa-0237-1edd-1662a6ae28cd@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:20:10 +0200
From: Johannes Zink <j.zink@...gutronix.de>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
patchwork-jzi@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: stmmac: correct MAC propagation delay
Hi Richard,
On 7/26/23 22:57, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:01:31PM +0200, Johannes Zink wrote:
>
> Earlier versions of the IP core return zero from these...
>
>> +#define PTP_TS_INGR_LAT 0x68 /* MAC internal Ingress Latency */
>> +#define PTP_TS_EGR_LAT 0x6c /* MAC internal Egress Latency */
>
good catch. Gonna send a v3 with a check to and set the values for dwmac v5 only.
Best regards
Johannes
> and so...
>
>> +static void correct_latency(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *ioaddr = priv->ptpaddr;
>> + u32 reg_tsic, reg_tsicsns;
>> + u32 reg_tsec, reg_tsecsns;
>> + u64 scaled_ns;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + /* MAC-internal ingress latency */
>> + scaled_ns = readl(ioaddr + PTP_TS_INGR_LAT);
>> +
>> + /* See section 11.7.2.5.3.1 "Ingress Correction" on page 4001 of
>> + * i.MX8MP Applications Processor Reference Manual Rev. 1, 06/2021
>> + */
>> + val = readl(ioaddr + PTP_TCR);
>> + if (val & PTP_TCR_TSCTRLSSR)
>> + /* nanoseconds field is in decimal format with granularity of 1ns/bit */
>> + scaled_ns = ((u64)NSEC_PER_SEC << 16) - scaled_ns;
>> + else
>> + /* nanoseconds field is in binary format with granularity of ~0.466ns/bit */
>> + scaled_ns = ((1ULL << 31) << 16) -
>> + DIV_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(scaled_ns * PSEC_PER_NSEC, 466U);
>> +
>> + reg_tsic = scaled_ns >> 16;
>> + reg_tsicsns = scaled_ns & 0xff00;
>> +
>> + /* set bit 31 for 2's compliment */
>> + reg_tsic |= BIT(31);
>> +
>> + writel(reg_tsic, ioaddr + PTP_TS_INGR_CORR_NS);
>
> here reg_tsic = 0x80000000 for a correction of -2.15 seconds! >
> @Jakub Can you please revert this patch?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Johannes Zink |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686| Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists