[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c9eda9d-c433-93c5-9719-78c4940c7957@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:41:06 +0200
From: Johannes Zink <j.zink@...gutronix.de>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patchwork-jzi@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: stmmac: correct MAC propagation delay
Hi,
On 7/27/23 08:55, Johannes Zink wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/27/23 08:39, Johannes Zink wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>
> [snip]
>
>
>>> How many _other_ SoCs did you test your patch on?
>>>
>> I don't have many available, thus as stated in the description: on the
>> i.MX8MP only. That's why I am implementing my stuff in the imx glue code,
>> you're welcome to help testing on other hardware if you have any at hand.
small correction to what I wrote earlier: it's not implemented in the gluecode,
but in the general stmmac_hwtstamp. My bad, I added it to the gluecode in an
early prototype version, but then tried to generalize it.
Johannes
>
> note: for v3 I am going to check if we have a dwmac v5 and won't call into the
> correction setup function otherwise.
>
> Best regards
> Johannes
>
>
>> Best regards
>> Johannes
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Richard
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Johannes Zink |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686| Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists