Message-ID: <20230801142621.7925-3-hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  1 Aug 2023 22:26:21 +0800
From: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@...il.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net,
	john.fastabend@...il.com,
	andrii@...nel.org,
	martin.lau@...ux.dev,
	song@...nel.org,
	yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
	kpsingh@...nel.org,
	sdf@...gle.com,
	haoluo@...gle.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	hawk@...nel.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org,
	mhiramat@...nel.org,
	mykolal@...com,
	shuah@...nel.org,
	hffilwlqm@...il.com,
	tangyeechou@...il.com,
	kernel-patches-bot@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add testcase for xdp attaching failure tracepoint

Add a test case for the tracepoint of xdp attaching failure by bpf
tracepoint when attach XDP to a device with invalid flags option.

The bpf tracepoint retrieves error message from the tracepoint, and
then put the error message to a perf buffer. The testing code receives
error message from perf buffer, and then ASSERT "Invalid XDP flags for
BPF link attachment".

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@...il.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_attach.c     | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/test_xdp_attach_fail.c          | 54 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_attach_fail.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_attach.c
index fa3cac5488f5d..e6bcb6051402d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_attach.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 #include <test_progs.h>
+#include "test_xdp_attach_fail.skel.h"
 
 #define IFINDEX_LO 1
 #define XDP_FLAGS_REPLACE		(1U << 4)
@@ -85,10 +86,74 @@ static void test_xdp_attach(const char *file)
 	bpf_object__close(obj1);
 }
 
+#define ERRMSG_LEN 64
+
+struct xdp_errmsg {
+	char msg[ERRMSG_LEN];
+};
+
+static void on_xdp_errmsg(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 size)
+{
+	struct xdp_errmsg *ctx_errmg = ctx, *tp_errmsg = data;
+
+	memcpy(&ctx_errmg->msg, &tp_errmsg->msg, ERRMSG_LEN);
+}
+
+static const char tgt_errmsg[] = "Invalid XDP flags for BPF link attachment";
+
+static void test_xdp_attach_fail(const char *file)
+{
+	struct test_xdp_attach_fail *skel = NULL;
+	struct xdp_errmsg errmsg = {};
+	struct perf_buffer *pb = NULL;
+	struct bpf_object *obj = NULL;
+	int err, fd_xdp;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, opts);
+
+	skel = test_xdp_attach_fail__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_xdp_attach_fail__open_and_load"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	err = test_xdp_attach_fail__attach(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "test_xdp_attach_fail__attach"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* set up perf buffer */
+	pb = perf_buffer__new(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.xdp_errmsg_pb), 1,
+			      on_xdp_errmsg, NULL, &errmsg, NULL);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(pb, "perf_buffer__new"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &fd_xdp);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "bpf_prog_test_load"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	opts.flags = 0xFF; // invalid flags to fail to attach XDP prog
+	err = bpf_link_create(fd_xdp, IFINDEX_LO, BPF_XDP, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -EINVAL, "bpf_link_create"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	/* read perf buffer */
+	err = perf_buffer__poll(pb, 100);
+	if (!ASSERT_GT(err, -1, "perf_buffer__poll"))
+		goto out_close;
+
+	ASSERT_STRNEQ((const char *) errmsg.msg, tgt_errmsg,
+		      42 /* strlen(tgt_errmsg) */, "check error message");
+
+out_close:
+	perf_buffer__free(pb);
+	bpf_object__close(obj);
+	test_xdp_attach_fail__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 void serial_test_xdp_attach(void)
 {
 	if (test__start_subtest("xdp_attach"))
 		test_xdp_attach("./test_xdp.bpf.o");
 	if (test__start_subtest("xdp_attach_dynptr"))
 		test_xdp_attach("./test_xdp_dynptr.bpf.o");
+	if (test__start_subtest("xdp_attach_failed"))
+		test_xdp_attach_fail("./xdp_dummy.bpf.o");
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_attach_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_attach_fail.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..2ff1b596e87ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_attach_fail.c
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright Leon Hwang */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+#define ERRMSG_LEN 64
+
+struct xdp_errmsg {
+	char msg[ERRMSG_LEN];
+};
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, int);
+} xdp_errmsg_pb SEC(".maps");
+
+struct xdp_attach_error_ctx {
+	unsigned long unused;
+
+	/*
+	 * bpf does not support tracepoint __data_loc directly.
+	 *
+	 * Actually, this field is a 32 bit integer whose value encodes
+	 * information on where to find the actual data. The first 2 bytes is
+	 * the size of the data. The last 2 bytes is the offset from the start
+	 * of the tracepoint struct where the data begins.
+	 * -- https://github.com/iovisor/bpftrace/pull/1542
+	 */
+	__u32 msg; // __data_loc char[] msg;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Catch the error message at the tracepoint.
+ */
+
+SEC("tp/xdp/bpf_xdp_link_attach_failed")
+int tp__xdp__bpf_xdp_link_attach_failed(struct xdp_attach_error_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	char *msg = (void *)(__u64) ((void *) ctx + (__u16) ctx->msg);
+	struct xdp_errmsg errmsg = {};
+
+	bpf_probe_read_kernel_str(&errmsg.msg, ERRMSG_LEN, msg);
+	bpf_perf_event_output(ctx, &xdp_errmsg_pb, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU, &errmsg,
+			      ERRMSG_LEN);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Reuse the XDP program in xdp_dummy.c.
+ */
+
+char LICENSE[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.41.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists