[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <457944e2-c8bc-74a7-ec5b-4502c4ec2664@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 17:11:16 +0200
From: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] ice: Block switchdev mode when ADQ is acvite and
vice versa
On 03.08.2023 15:26, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 03:11:26PM CEST, leon@...nel.org wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 01:52:35PM +0200, Marcin Szycik wrote:
>>> ADQ and switchdev are not supported simultaneously. Enabling both at the
>>> same time can result in nullptr dereference.
>>>
>>> To prevent this, check if ADQ is active when changing devlink mode to
>>> switchdev mode, and check if switchdev is active when enabling ADQ.
>>>
>>> Fixes: fbc7b27af0f9 ("ice: enable ndo_setup_tc support for mqprio_qdisc")
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_eswitch.c | 5 +++++
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 6 ++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_eswitch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_eswitch.c
>>> index ad0a007b7398..2ea5aaceee11 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_eswitch.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_eswitch.c
>>> @@ -538,6 +538,11 @@ ice_eswitch_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink, u16 mode,
>>> break;
>>> case DEVLINK_ESWITCH_MODE_SWITCHDEV:
>>> {
>>> + if (ice_is_adq_active(pf)) {
>>> + dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(pf), "switchdev cannot be configured - ADQ is active. Delete ADQ configs using TC and try again\n");
>
> Does this provide sufficient hint to the user? I mean, what's ADQ and
> how it is related to TC objects? Please be more precise.
Application Device Queues, a conflicting feature unrelated to switchdev.
If it's enabled, there's a good chance the user knows what it is because
they configured it.
Could you suggest a better error message?
>
>
>>
>> It needs to be reported through netlink extack.
>>
>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> dev_info(ice_pf_to_dev(pf), "PF %d changed eswitch mode to switchdev",
>>> pf->hw.pf_id);
>>> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Changed eswitch mode to switchdev");
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
Regards,
Marcin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists