lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iL_ajkpP3AX26Eieevp4ZwVUCfbVX8Xge-Bc9G3SfBdcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 09:37:56 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: menglong8.dong@...il.com
Cc: ncardwell@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, 
	pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, flyingpeng@...cent.com, 
	Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/4] net: tcp: allow zero-window ACK update
 the window

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 5:01 AM <menglong8.dong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
>
> Fow now, an ACK can update the window in following case, according to
> the tcp_may_update_window():
>
> 1. the ACK acknowledged new data
> 2. the ACK has new data
> 3. the ACK expand the window and the seq of it is valid
>
> Now, we allow the ACK update the window if the window is 0, and the
> seq/ack of it is valid. This is for the case that the receiver replies
> an zero-window ACK when it is under memory stress and can't queue the new
> data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ