netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device tree bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c9344953-9367-0ab0-fa42-3117d17643eb@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 08:18:18 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@...sung.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 richardcochran@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
 joabreu@...opsys.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
 linux-fsd@...la.com, pankaj.dubey@...sung.com, swathi.ks@...sung.com,
 ravi.patel@...sung.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device tree
 bindings

On 16/08/2023 07:58, Sriranjani P wrote:
>>> +
>>> +allOf:
>>> +  - $ref: snps,dwmac.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    const: tesla,fsd-ethqos-4.21.yaml
>>
>> ?
> 
> Will fix this to tesla,fsd-ethqos.yaml 

Test your patches before sending. REALLY TEST.

> 
>>> +
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  interrupts:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  clocks:
>>> +    minItems: 5
>>
>> Why? I expect it to be specific.
> 
> Sorry, I could not understood this comment. In FSD we have two instances of EQoS IP, one in PERIC block, which requires total 10 clocks  to be configured and another instance exist in FSYS0 block which needs 5 clocks to be configured, so we kept minItems as 5 and maxItems as 10, but looks like latest items schema do not need maxItems entry so we will drop maxItems entry. In my understanding minItems still required so it should be kept with minimum number of clock requirements.

No, the code is fine then.

> 
>>
>>> +    maxItems: 10
>>> +
>>> +  clock-names:
>>> +    minItems: 5
>>> +    maxItems: 10
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: ptp_ref
>>> +      - const: master_bus
>>> +      - const: slave_bus
>>> +      - const: tx
>>> +      - const: rx
>>> +      - const: master2_bus
>>> +      - const: slave2_bus
>>> +      - const: eqos_rxclk_mux
>>> +      - const: eqos_phyrxclk
>>> +      - const: dout_peric_rgmii_clk
>>> +
>>> +  fsd-rx-clock-skew:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - description: phandle to the syscon node
>>> +          - description: offset of the control register
>>> +    description:
>>> +      Should be phandle/offset pair. The phandle to the syscon node.
>>> +
>>> +  iommus:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  phy-mode:
>>> +    $ref: ethernet-controller.yaml#/properties/phy-connection-type
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> +  - compatible
>>> +  - reg
>>> +  - interrupts
>>> +  - clocks
>>> +  - clock-names
>>> +  - rx-clock-skew
>>
>> Eee? Isn't it fsd-rx-clock-skew which anyway is not correct?
> 
> Sorry, I missed to change this in DT schema before posting, I will make this to fsd-rx-clock-skew. 

Remember about vendor prefixes for every custom property.


Best regards,
Krzysztof