[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC_iWjLRR3sEZNDTAtD2sZ4UY3aZxGZSyA8y9mOB3SkZsVp7ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 10:40:09 +0300
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, hawk@...nel.org, aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
linyunsheng@...wei.com, almasrymina@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 03/13] net: page_pool: factor out uninit
Hi Jakub,
[...]
> }
>
> +static void page_pool_uninit(struct page_pool *pool)
> +{
> + ptr_ring_cleanup(&pool->ring, NULL);
> +
> + if (pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP)
> + put_device(pool->p.dev);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL_STATS
> + free_percpu(pool->recycle_stats);
> +#endif
> +}
I am not sure I am following the reasoning here. The only extra thing
page_pool_free() does is disconnect the pool. So I assume no one will
call page_pool_uninit() directly. Do you expect page_pool_free() to
grow in the future, so factoring out the uninit makes the code easier
to read?
Thanks
/Ilias
> +
> /**
> * page_pool_create() - create a page pool.
> * @params: parameters, see struct page_pool_params
> @@ -806,14 +818,7 @@ static void page_pool_free(struct page_pool *pool)
> if (pool->disconnect)
> pool->disconnect(pool);
>
> - ptr_ring_cleanup(&pool->ring, NULL);
> -
> - if (pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP)
> - put_device(pool->p.dev);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL_STATS
> - free_percpu(pool->recycle_stats);
> -#endif
> + page_pool_uninit(pool);
> kfree(pool);
> }
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists