lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230818183640.GA22185@unreal>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 21:36:40 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Dima Chumak <dchumak@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
	Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/8] devlink: Add port function attributes

On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 09:38:12AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 07:19:59 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > It is very strange to expect 1 series per vendor/driver without taking
> > into account the size of that driver and the amount of upstream work
> > involvement from that vendor.
> 
> According to the "reviewer rotation" nVidia is supposed to be reviewing
> this week. Sorry it fell on you in particular, but as a company y'all
> definitely are not pulling your weight.

I can't speak for my company and for my colleagues who are OOO during
these days because of summer break, but only for me.

I'm trying my best to review and reduce maintainers burden. Should I stop?

> Then Saeed pings me to pull your RDMA stuff faster

Saeed explained to you why he needs it faster - merge conflict.

> and you have to audacity to call the basic rules we had for a very long
> time "very strange".

This rule relies on basic contract of 1 series -> fast review/acceptance.
Once fast review/acceptance doesn't happen, what else do you expect from me?

Thanks

> 
> SMH

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ