lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <64e0d3359f90d_3119e32942c@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 10:35:33 -0400 From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, sdf@...gle.com, axboe@...nel.dk, asml.silence@...il.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, martin.lau@...ux.dev, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org, krisman@...e.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] net/socket: Break down __sys_setsockopt Breno Leitao wrote: > Split __sys_setsockopt() into two functions by removing the core > logic into a sub-function (do_sock_setsockopt()). This will avoid > code duplication when doing the same operation in other callers, for > instance. > > do_sock_setsockopt() will be called by io_uring setsockopt() command > operation in the following patch. > > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com> > --- > include/net/sock.h | 2 ++ > net/socket.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h > index 2eb916d1ff64..2a0324275347 100644 > --- a/include/net/sock.h > +++ b/include/net/sock.h > @@ -1853,6 +1853,8 @@ int sk_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname, > sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen); > int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op, > sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen); > +int do_sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level, > + int optname, sockptr_t optval, int optlen); Somewhat surprising that optlen type differs between __sys_setsockopt and sock_setsockopt. But agreed that this code should follow __sys_setsockopt.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists