lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202308220205.gbt5lcAY-lkp@intel.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 02:38:12 +0800 From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add reset bits for MT7988 Hi Daniel, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on linux-next/master] [cannot apply to net/main linus/master v6.5-rc7] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Daniel-Golle/net-ethernet-mtk_eth_soc-add-reset-bits-for-MT7988/20230821-102205 base: linux-next/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b983a3adf5184a30e4ce620fbbf028c9c76648ae.1692382239.git.daniel%40makrotopia.org patch subject: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add reset bits for MT7988 config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230822/202308220205.gbt5lcAY-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230822/202308220205.gbt5lcAY-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308220205.gbt5lcAY-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:31: drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c: In function 'mtk_hw_reset': >> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:3625:50: error: 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE1'? 3625 | if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h:1022:53: note: in definition of macro 'MTK_HAS_CAPS' 1022 | #define MTK_HAS_CAPS(caps, _x) (((caps) & (_x)) == (_x)) | ^~ drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:3625:50: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in 3625 | if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h:1022:53: note: in definition of macro 'MTK_HAS_CAPS' 1022 | #define MTK_HAS_CAPS(caps, _x) (((caps) & (_x)) == (_x)) | ^~ drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c: In function 'mtk_hw_warm_reset': drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:3673:50: error: 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE1'? 3673 | if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h:1022:53: note: in definition of macro 'MTK_HAS_CAPS' 1022 | #define MTK_HAS_CAPS(caps, _x) (((caps) & (_x)) == (_x)) | ^~ drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c: In function 'mtk_prepare_for_reset': drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:4042:50: error: 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE1'? 4042 | if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h:1022:53: note: in definition of macro 'MTK_HAS_CAPS' 1022 | #define MTK_HAS_CAPS(caps, _x) (((caps) & (_x)) == (_x)) | ^~ drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c: In function 'mtk_pending_work': drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c:4113:50: error: 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE1'? 4113 | if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h:1022:53: note: in definition of macro 'MTK_HAS_CAPS' 1022 | #define MTK_HAS_CAPS(caps, _x) (((caps) & (_x)) == (_x)) | ^~ vim +3625 drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c 3611 3612 static void mtk_hw_reset(struct mtk_eth *eth) 3613 { 3614 u32 val; 3615 3616 if (mtk_is_netsys_v2_or_greater(eth)) 3617 regmap_write(eth->ethsys, ETHSYS_FE_RST_CHK_IDLE_EN, 0); 3618 3619 if (mtk_is_netsys_v3_or_greater(eth)) { 3620 val = RSTCTRL_PPE0_V3; 3621 3622 if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE1)) 3623 val |= RSTCTRL_PPE1_V3; 3624 > 3625 if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE2)) 3626 val |= RSTCTRL_PPE2; 3627 3628 val |= RSTCTRL_WDMA0 | RSTCTRL_WDMA1 | RSTCTRL_WDMA2; 3629 } else if (mtk_is_netsys_v2_or_greater(eth)) { 3630 val = RSTCTRL_PPE0_V2; 3631 3632 if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_RSTCTRL_PPE1)) 3633 val |= RSTCTRL_PPE1; 3634 } else { 3635 val = RSTCTRL_PPE0; 3636 } 3637 3638 ethsys_reset(eth, RSTCTRL_ETH | RSTCTRL_FE | val); 3639 3640 if (mtk_is_netsys_v3_or_greater(eth)) 3641 regmap_write(eth->ethsys, ETHSYS_FE_RST_CHK_IDLE_EN, 3642 0x6f8ff); 3643 else if (mtk_is_netsys_v2_or_greater(eth)) 3644 regmap_write(eth->ethsys, ETHSYS_FE_RST_CHK_IDLE_EN, 3645 0x3ffffff); 3646 } 3647 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists