netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/9] ice: use ice_pf_src_tmr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:53:01 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
 anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Simon
 Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@...el.com>,
 intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Jiri
 Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/9] ice: use
 ice_pf_src_tmr_owned where available

On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:06:51 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> Can I suggest change in the process?
> 1. Perform validation before posting
> 2. Intel will post their patches to the netdev@ ML.
> 3. Tony will collect reviewed patches from netdev@
> 4. Tony will send clean PRs (without patches) from time to time to
> netdev maintainers for acceptance.
> 
> It will allow to all of us (Intel, Nvidia e.t.c) to have same submission
> flow without sacrificing open netdev@ review which will be done only once.
> 
> Jakub/Dave, is it possible?

That sounds worse than what they are doing today. And I can't help
but think that you're targeting them because I asked you to stop posting
directly for net-next. Vendetta is not a good guide for process changes.

Let's see what the 6.6 development stats look like. Then we'll have
a discussion about what we can improve.