[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230822171512.GO6029@unreal>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 20:15:12 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/9] ice: use
ice_pf_src_tmr_owned where available
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 09:53:01AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:06:51 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > Can I suggest change in the process?
> > 1. Perform validation before posting
> > 2. Intel will post their patches to the netdev@ ML.
> > 3. Tony will collect reviewed patches from netdev@
> > 4. Tony will send clean PRs (without patches) from time to time to
> > netdev maintainers for acceptance.
> >
> > It will allow to all of us (Intel, Nvidia e.t.c) to have same submission
> > flow without sacrificing open netdev@ review which will be done only once.
> >
> > Jakub/Dave, is it possible?
>
> That sounds worse than what they are doing today. And I can't help
> but think that you're targeting them because I asked you to stop posting
> directly for net-next. Vendetta is not a good guide for process changes.
Are you real? I had this idea even BEFORE you started to be netdev@
maintainer and had put it on paper BEFORE your request.
Should I add you to our internal conversation about it so you will be
able to see dates by yourself?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists