netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/9] ice: use ice_pf_src_tmr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 20:15:12 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
	Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@...el.com>,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/9] ice: use
 ice_pf_src_tmr_owned where available

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 09:53:01AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 19:06:51 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > Can I suggest change in the process?
> > 1. Perform validation before posting
> > 2. Intel will post their patches to the netdev@ ML.
> > 3. Tony will collect reviewed patches from netdev@
> > 4. Tony will send clean PRs (without patches) from time to time to
> > netdev maintainers for acceptance.
> > 
> > It will allow to all of us (Intel, Nvidia e.t.c) to have same submission
> > flow without sacrificing open netdev@ review which will be done only once.
> > 
> > Jakub/Dave, is it possible?
> 
> That sounds worse than what they are doing today. And I can't help
> but think that you're targeting them because I asked you to stop posting
> directly for net-next. Vendetta is not a good guide for process changes.

Are you real? I had this idea even BEFORE you started to be netdev@
maintainer and had put it on paper BEFORE your request.

Should I add you to our internal conversation about it so you will be
able to see dates by yourself?

Thanks