netdev - Re: [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230830133246.1a059f0a@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 13:32:46 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org,
 intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.6

A minor follow up / question.

Would it be helpful to generate these kind of stats scoped to
particular companies?

Very few people end up in the top 12. It may not be entirely trivial 
to run these scripts locally because people use their non-company
addresses at times. And because of GDPR and data privacy concerns 
I don't want to upload raw results to GitHub or some such :(

The best idea I could come up with was to post the stats
to a per-company ML. Intel has the "wired" list which is 
a perfect fit. That way the result is accessible to developers,
and they can refer to it in the "performance review" or
whenever they want to get credit for upstream reviews? :)

Does that sound sensible?

Please don't hesitate to LMK either on or off list. 
Particularly if you think this is a bad idea.

And LMK if any other company wants similar stats.