netdev - Re: [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 09:45:19 -0700
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org>,
	<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.6

On 8/30/2023 1:32 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> A minor follow up / question.
> 
> Would it be helpful to generate these kind of stats scoped to
> particular companies?
> 
> Very few people end up in the top 12. It may not be entirely trivial 
> to run these scripts locally because people use their non-company
> addresses at times. And because of GDPR and data privacy concerns 
> I don't want to upload raw results to GitHub or some such :(
> 
> The best idea I could come up with was to post the stats
> to a per-company ML. Intel has the "wired" list which is 
> a perfect fit. That way the result is accessible to developers,
> and they can refer to it in the "performance review" or
> whenever they want to get credit for upstream reviews? :)
> 
> Does that sound sensible?
> 
> Please don't hesitate to LMK either on or off list. 
> Particularly if you think this is a bad idea.
> 
> And LMK if any other company wants similar stats.

We got ours for the cycle, thank you! I think this is a great idea.