[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pm34slyw.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 15:22:41 +0200
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To: François Michel <francois.michel@...ouvain.be>
CC: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 iproute2-next 1/2] tc: support the netem seed
parameter for loss and corruption events
François Michel <francois.michel@...ouvain.be> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Le 29/08/23 à 12:07, Petr Machata a écrit :
>> Took me a while to fight my way through all the unreads to this, and
>> it's already merged, but...
>> francois.michel@...ouvain.be writes:
>>
>>> diff --git a/tc/q_netem.c b/tc/q_netem.c
>>> index 8ace2b61..febddd49 100644
>>> --- a/tc/q_netem.c
>>> +++ b/tc/q_netem.c
>>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ static void explain(void)
>>> " [ loss random PERCENT [CORRELATION]]\n"
>>> " [ loss state P13 [P31 [P32 [P23 P14]]]\n"
>>> " [ loss gemodel PERCENT [R [1-H [1-K]]]\n"
>>> + " [ seed SEED \n]"
>> The newline seems misplaced.
>
> Sorry for that, I don't know how I could have missed that.
> Should I send a patch to fix this ?
That would be the way to get it fixed, yes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists