[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZPiIMPKDEadvX2oI@lincoln>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 16:09:52 +0200
From: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
CC: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<andrii@...nel.org>, <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, <song@...nel.org>, <yhs@...com>,
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>, <sdf@...gle.com>,
<haoluo@...gle.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>, Anatoly Burakov
<anatoly.burakov@...el.com>, Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>, Maryam Tahhan
<mtahhan@...hat.com>, <xdp-hints@...-project.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next 00/23] XDP metadata via kfuncs for ice
+ mlx5
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 06:06:51PM +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 09:26:39PM +0200, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> > Alexei has requested an implementation of VLAN and checksum XDP hints
> > for one more driver [0].
> >
> > This series is exactly the v5 of "XDP metadata via kfuncs for ice" [1]
> > with 2 additional patches for mlx5.
> >
> > Firstly, there is a VLAN hint implementation. I am pretty sure this
> > one works and would not object adding it to the main series, if someone
> > from nvidia ACKs it.
> >
> > The second patch is a checksum hint implementation and it is very rough.
> > There is logic duplication and some missing features, but I am sure it
> > captures the main points of the potential end implementation.
> >
> > I think it is unrealistic for me to provide a fully working mlx5 checksum
> > hint implementation (complex logic, no HW), so would much rather prefer
> > not having it in my main series. My main intension with this RFC is
> > to prove proposed hints functions are suitable for non-intel HW.
>
> I went through ice patches mostly, can you provide performance numbers for
> XDP workloads without metadata in picture? I'd like to see whether
> standard 64b traffic gets affected or not since you're modifying
> ice_rx_ring layout.
Thank you for the review, I will send the next version with performance numbers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists