[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZPge1LuqIRk9N2P0@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 07:40:20 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>, Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
davem@...emloft.net, Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@...rochip.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net v4] net: phy: Provide Module 4 KSZ9477 errata (DS80000754C)
On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 01:29:45AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> It's probably not causing practical harm, but currently, we tell
> genphy_config_eee_advert() to include reserved bits of the MMD EEE
> Advertising Register (MMD 0x07 : 0x3C) into its modification mask.
Ah, you've fallen into that trap. genphy_config_eee_advert() is
obsolete and redundant. Nothing calls it, and it should be removed.
What's actually used is genphy_c45_an_config_eee_aneg() and
genphy_c45_write_eee_adv(). The latter will not modify any reserved
bits in the register.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists