[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3DB6DD63-C8AB-4009-8AF8-79290054AC5C@hpe.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:12:54 +0000
From: "Hawkins, Nick" <nick.hawkins@....com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: "christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr" <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
"simon.horman@...igine.com" <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
"Verdun, Jean-Marie"
<verdun@....com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] net: hpe: Add GXP UMAC Driver
> > I have been trying to figure out how exactly I can translate the current code
> > over to using the page pool api over the past week. It seems like it is quiet
> > a complex change. As the driver seems to be keeping up with our
> > performance requirements would it be acceptable to mark this as a
> Its not just performance. Using well debugged and shared core code
> means less bugs in your driver. It makes maintenance simpler since
> there are more people who understand the page pool code than what you
> have in your driver and it makes your driver more like other drivers.
> So overall you will end up with a better quality driver by adapting
> the page pool code.
Greetings Andrew,
In that case I will continue to attempt to try and adopt the page pool
API. In all the examples with page pool HW rings it appears they are
using alloc_etherdev_mqs. Are there any HW requirements to use this
library? If there are none what is the typical number for rx and tx
queues?
Thank you for the assistance,
-Nick Hawkins
Powered by blists - more mailing lists