netdev - [PATCH][next] tls: Use size_add() in call to struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZQSspmE8Ww8/UNkH@work>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:12:38 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] tls: Use size_add() in call to struct_size()

If, for any reason, the open-coded arithmetic causes a wraparound,
the protection that `struct_size()` adds against potential integer
overflows is defeated. Fix this by hardening call to `struct_size()`
with `size_add()`.

Fixes: b89fec54fd61 ("tls: rx: wrap decrypt params in a struct")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
---
 net/tls/tls_sw.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index d1fc295b83b5..270712b8d391 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ static int tls_decrypt_sg(struct sock *sk, struct iov_iter *out_iov,
 	 */
 	aead_size = sizeof(*aead_req) + crypto_aead_reqsize(ctx->aead_recv);
 	aead_size = ALIGN(aead_size, __alignof__(*dctx));
-	mem = kmalloc(aead_size + struct_size(dctx, sg, n_sgin + n_sgout),
+	mem = kmalloc(aead_size + struct_size(dctx, sg, size_add(n_sgin, n_sgout)),
 		      sk->sk_allocation);
 	if (!mem) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.34.1