[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202309151242.BC470261F@keescook>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 12:42:37 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] tls: Use size_add() in call to struct_size()
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 01:12:38PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> If, for any reason, the open-coded arithmetic causes a wraparound,
> the protection that `struct_size()` adds against potential integer
> overflows is defeated. Fix this by hardening call to `struct_size()`
> with `size_add()`.
>
> Fixes: b89fec54fd61 ("tls: rx: wrap decrypt params in a struct")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists