lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6c6b06f-4f90-62da-7774-02b737198ce0@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 14:18:55 -0500
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Raju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] amd-xgbe: read STAT1 register twice to get correct
 value



On 9/15/23 07:41, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 09:49:44AM +0530, Raju Rangoju wrote:
>> Link status is latched low, so read once to clear
>> and then read again to get current state.
> 
> I don't know about your PHY implementation, but within phylib and
> Linux PHY drivers, this is considered wrong. You loose out on being
> notified of the link going down and then back up again. Or up and then
> down again.
> 
> But since this is not a Linux PHY driver, you are free to do whatever
> you want...
> 
> Also, i believe it is latched, not latched low. So i think your commit
> message is wrong. You should probably check with IEEE 802.3 clause 22.

Granted I have an old version of IEEE 802.3, but "Table 22-8 - Status 
register bit definitions" has:

1.2	Link Status	1 = link is up	0 = link is down	RO/LL

So latched low.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
>      Andrew
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ