[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <550df73160cd600f797823b86fde2c2b3526b133.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 10:35:25 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Jordan Rife
<jrife@...gle.com>, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dborkman@...nel.org, philipp.reisner@...bit.com,
lars.ellenberg@...bit.com, christoph.boehmwalder@...bit.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, airlied@...hat.com, chengyou@...ux.alibaba.com,
kaishen@...ux.alibaba.com, jgg@...pe.ca, leon@...nel.org,
bmt@...ich.ibm.com, isdn@...ux-pingi.de, ccaulfie@...hat.com,
teigland@...hat.com, mark@...heh.com, jlbec@...lplan.org,
joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com, sfrench@...ba.org, pc@...guebit.com,
lsahlber@...hat.com, sprasad@...rosoft.com, tom@...pey.com,
horms@...ge.net.au, ja@....bg, pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...filter.org,
fw@...len.de, santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 3/3] net: prevent address rewrite in kernel_bind()
On Wed, 2023-09-20 at 09:30 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Jordan Rife wrote:
> > Similar to the change in commit 0bdf399342c5("net: Avoid address
> > overwrite in kernel_connect"), BPF hooks run on bind may rewrite the
> > address passed to kernel_bind(). This change
> >
> > 1) Makes a copy of the bind address in kernel_bind() to insulate
> > callers.
> > 2) Replaces direct calls to sock->ops->bind() with kernel_bind()
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230912013332.2048422-1-jrife@google.com/
> > Fixes: 4fbac77d2d09 ("bpf: Hooks for sys_bind")
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@...gle.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
I fear this is going to cause a few conflicts with other trees. We can
still take it, but at very least we will need some acks from the
relevant maintainers.
I *think* it would be easier split this and patch 1/3 in individual
patches targeting the different trees, hopefully not many additional
patches will be required. What do you think?
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists