netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] tcp: derive delack_max from rto

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89i+bXkgHWSgkqYToAGofE4qdJC142MmSR4eV2uD4408nVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 14:58:03 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>, 
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] tcp: derive delack_max from rto_min

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 2:37 PM David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org> wrote:
>

> My comment is solely about mismatch on data types. I am surprised use of
> max_t with mixed data types does not throw a compiler warning.

This was intentional.

This is max_t() purpose really.

Perhaps you are thinking about max() ?