[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y1gqmugw.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:02:23 +0200
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
To: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai
Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song
<yhs@...com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh
<kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo
<haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Luke Nelson
<luke.r.nels@...il.com>, Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>, Pu Lehui
<pulehui@...weicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] riscv, bpf: Add necessary Zbb instructions
Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com> writes:
> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
>
> Add necessary Zbb instructions introduced by [0] to reduce code size and
> improve performance of RV64 JIT. Meanwhile, a runtime deteted helper is
> added to check whether the CPU supports Zbb instructions.
>
> Link: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/releases/download/1.0.0/bitmanip-1.0.0-38-g865e7a7.pdf [0]
> Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> index 8e0ef4d08..4e24fb2bd 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ static inline bool rvc_enabled(void)
> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C);
> }
>
> +static inline bool rvzbb_enabled(void)
> +{
> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) && riscv_has_extension_likely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB);
> +}
> +
> enum {
> RV_REG_ZERO = 0, /* The constant value 0 */
> RV_REG_RA = 1, /* Return address */
> @@ -727,6 +732,27 @@ static inline u16 rvc_swsp(u32 imm8, u8 rs2)
> return rv_css_insn(0x6, imm, rs2, 0x2);
> }
>
> +/* RVZBB instrutions. */
> +static inline u32 rvzbb_sextb(u8 rd, u8 rs1)
> +{
> + return rv_i_insn(0x604, rs1, 1, rd, 0x13);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 rvzbb_sexth(u8 rd, u8 rs1)
> +{
> + return rv_i_insn(0x605, rs1, 1, rd, 0x13);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 rvzbb_zexth(u8 rd, u8 rs)
> +{
> + return rv_i_insn(0x80, rs, 4, rd, __riscv_xlen == 64 ? 0x3b : 0x33);
Encoding funcs are hard to read as it is, so let's try to be a bit more
explicit.
I would prefer a
| if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
| return 64bitvariant
| return 32bitvariant
version.
Or a 64-bit only variant elsewhere, since this series is only aimed for
64-bit anyway.
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 rvzbb_rev8(u8 rd, u8 rs)
> +{
> + return rv_i_insn(__riscv_xlen == 64 ? 0x6b8 : 0x698, rs, 5, rd, 0x13);
Dito.
Björn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists