netdev - Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: handle the connecting collision properly in nf_conntrack_proto

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZRwOVyKQR8MBjpBh@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 14:51:35 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: handle the connecting collision properly
 in nf_conntrack_proto_sctp

On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:07:48AM -0400, Xin Long wrote:

...

> @@ -481,6 +486,24 @@ int nf_conntrack_sctp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
>  			    old_state == SCTP_CONNTRACK_CLOSED &&
>  			    nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct))
>  				ignore = true;
> +		} else if (sch->type == SCTP_CID_INIT_ACK) {
> +			struct sctp_inithdr _ih, *ih;
> +			u32 vtag;
> +
> +			ih = skb_header_pointer(skb, offset + sizeof(_sch), sizeof(*ih), &_ih);
> +			if (ih == NULL)
> +				goto out_unlock;
> +
> +			vtag = ct->proto.sctp.vtag[!dir];
> +			if (!ct->proto.sctp.init[!dir] && vtag && vtag != ih->init_tag)
> +				goto out_unlock;
> +			/* collision */
> +			if (ct->proto.sctp.init[dir] && ct->proto.sctp.init[!dir] &&
> +			    vtag != ih->init_tag)

The type of vtag is u32. But the type of ct->proto.sctp.vtag[!dir] and init_tag
is __be32. This doesn't seem right (and makes Sparse unhappy).

> +				goto out_unlock;
> +
> +			pr_debug("Setting vtag %x for dir %d\n", ih->init_tag, !dir);
> +			ct->proto.sctp.vtag[!dir] = ih->init_tag;
>  		}
>  
>  		ct->proto.sctp.state = new_state;
> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 
>