[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49517916-e848-8dfe-48c5-f2240c6e740d@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 10:12:40 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@...il.com>
Cc: kernel-team@...a.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests for cgroup unix
socket address hooks
On 10/3/23 2:30 AM, Daan De Meyer wrote:
> These selftests are written in prog_tests style instead of adding
> them to the existing test_sock_addr tests. Migrating the existing
> sock addr tests to prog_tests style is left for future work. This
> commit adds support for testing bind() sockaddr hooks, even though
> there's no unix socket sockaddr hook for bind(). We leave this code
> intact for when the INET and INET6 tests are migrated in the future
> which do support intercepting bind().
>
> Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h | 14 +
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c | 34 +
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.h | 1 +
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/section_names.c | 25 +
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_addr.c | 612 ++++++++++++++++++
The progs/*_unix_prog.c is missing again, probably due to the rename. Please
monitor the CI test result:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20231003093025.475450-2-daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com/
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/6391271804/job/17346211558
A 'git status' to check for untracked file before 'git format-patch' can help also.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists