[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231006075536.3b21582e@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 07:55:36 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, corbet@....net,
davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] dpll: spec: add support for pin-dpll
signal phase offset/adjust
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 14:30:00 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >+version: 2
>
> I'm confused. Didn't you say you'll remove this? If not, my question
> from v1 still stands.
Perhaps we should dis-allow setting version in non-genetlink-legacy
specs? I thought it may be a useful thing to someone, at some point,
but so far the scoreboard is: legit uses: 0, confused uses: 1 :S
Thoughts?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists