netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] dpll: spec: add support for pin-dpll signal phase offset/adjust

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZSA7cEEc5nKl07/z@nanopsycho>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 18:53:04 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, corbet@....net,
	davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
	anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] dpll: spec: add support for pin-dpll
 signal phase offset/adjust

Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 04:55:36PM CEST, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 14:30:00 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >+version: 2  
>> 
>> I'm confused. Didn't you say you'll remove this? If not, my question
>> from v1 still stands.
>
>Perhaps we should dis-allow setting version in non-genetlink-legacy
>specs? I thought it may be a useful thing to someone, at some point,
>but so far the scoreboard is: legit uses: 0, confused uses: 1 :S
>
>Thoughts?

I don't know what the meaning of version is. I just never saw that being
touched. Is there any semantics documented for it?

Kuba, any opinion?