netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 07/16] net: phy: micrel: fix ts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1aac2644-af91-4408-b84a-0c92f1202f7c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 14:14:21 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
 "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
 Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
 Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
 Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
 Broadcom internal kernel review list
 <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
 <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 Radu Pirea <radu-nicolae.pirea@....nxp.com>,
 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
 Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
 Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 07/16] net: phy: micrel: fix ts_info value in
 case of no phc

On 10/9/23 08:51, Köry Maincent wrote:
> From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
> 
> In case of no phc we should not return SOFTWARE TIMESTAMPING flags as we do
> not know the netdev supports of timestamping.

There seems to be a word missing, maybe:

as we do not know whether the netdev supports timestamping.

> Remove it from the lan8841_ts_info and simply return 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
> ---
> 
> This patch is not tested but it seems consistent to me.

This does look correct to me as well.
-- 
Florian