netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] rust: core abstractions for network PHY drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 23:21:11 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, wedsonaf@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] rust: core abstractions for network PHY
 drivers

On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 05:07:18PM -0400, Trevor Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:24 AM FUJITA Tomonori
> <fujita.tomonori@...il.com> wrote:
> > Trevor gave Reviewed-by. Not perfect but reasonable shape, IMHO. Seems
> > that we have been discussing the same topics like locking, naming, etc
> > again and again.
> 
> To be clear: this is ONLY for the rust design, I am not at all
> qualified to review the build system integration. I provided a review
> with the known caveats that:

There is this patch going through review at the moment.

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/fad9a472-ae78-8672-6c93-58ddde1447d9@intel.com/T/

Which says:

+It's safe to assume that the maintainers know the community and the level
+of expertise of the reviewers. The reviewers should not be concerned about
+their comments impeding or derailing the patch flow.

Even though Rust is new to netdev, there has been enough discussion
that we should be able to figure out what reviewers domain of
expertise is. That is part of the job of being a Maintainer for
netdev.

    Andrew