netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ethtool: ice: Support for RSS settings to GTP from ethtool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231011094114.4d8f24c7@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:41:14 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: takeru hayasaka <hayatake396@...il.com>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Tony Nguyen
 <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ethtool: ice: Support for RSS settings to GTP
 from ethtool

On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 14:25:55 +0900 takeru hayasaka wrote:
> > Regarding the patch - you are only adding flow types, not a new field
> > (which are defined as RXH_*). If we want to hash on an extra field,
> > I think we need to specify that field as well?  
> 
> I've been really struggling with this...
> When I read the Intel ICE documentation, it suggests that in RSS, TEID
> can be an additional input.
> However, I couldn't think of a reason not to include TEID when
> enabling RSS for GTP cases.
> 
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/content-details/617015/intel-ethernet-controller-e810-dynamic-device-personalization-ddp-technology-guide.html
> (cf. Table 8. Patterns and Input Sets for iavf RSS)
> 
> However, for Flow Director, it's clear that you'd want to include the
> TEID field. But since I found that someone from Intel has already
> configured it to use TEID with Flow Director, I thought maybe we don't
> need to add the TEID parameter for now.
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/cover/20210126065206.137422-1-haiyue.wang@intel.com/
> 
> If we want to include something other than TEID (e.g., QFI) in Flow
> Director, I think it would be better to prepare a new field.

I think we should expose TEID as a field. It's easier to understand 
the API if fields are all listed, and not implied by the flow hash.