lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CADFiAc+67wdcS5enobbty-_U9SGX9Mr-C_0ipU_KJAV+h-t_Tg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:08:00 +0900 From: takeru hayasaka <hayatake396@...il.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ethtool: ice: Support for RSS settings to GTP from ethtool > I think we should expose TEID as a field. It's easier to understand > the API if fields are all listed, and not implied by the flow hash. Jakub san Thank you for your feedback! I would like to make changes and send them as a patch for the next version. 2023年10月12日(木) 1:41 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>: > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 14:25:55 +0900 takeru hayasaka wrote: > > > Regarding the patch - you are only adding flow types, not a new field > > > (which are defined as RXH_*). If we want to hash on an extra field, > > > I think we need to specify that field as well? > > > > I've been really struggling with this... > > When I read the Intel ICE documentation, it suggests that in RSS, TEID > > can be an additional input. > > However, I couldn't think of a reason not to include TEID when > > enabling RSS for GTP cases. > > > > https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/content-details/617015/intel-ethernet-controller-e810-dynamic-device-personalization-ddp-technology-guide.html > > (cf. Table 8. Patterns and Input Sets for iavf RSS) > > > > However, for Flow Director, it's clear that you'd want to include the > > TEID field. But since I found that someone from Intel has already > > configured it to use TEID with Flow Director, I thought maybe we don't > > need to add the TEID parameter for now. > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/cover/20210126065206.137422-1-haiyue.wang@intel.com/ > > > > If we want to include something other than TEID (e.g., QFI) in Flow > > Director, I think it would be better to prepare a new field. > > I think we should expose TEID as a field. It's easier to understand > the API if fields are all listed, and not implied by the flow hash.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists